| Specification | ARM Mali-450 MP4 | ARM Mali-G31 MP2 | | :--- | :--- | :--- | | | Utgard | Bifrost | | Release Date | Q2 2012 | Q1 2018 | | Manufacturing Process | 28nm | 28nm | | Core Configuration | 4 Shader Cores (Fragment Processors) | 2 Shader Cores (Execution Engines) | | API Support | OpenGL ES 2.0 | OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan 1.1, OpenCL 2.0 | | Max Clock Speed | 700 MHz | 650 MHz | | FP32 (GFLOPS) Perform. | ~47.6 | ~20.8 | | Pixel Fillrate (GPixels/s) | 1.3 | 0.43 | | Texel Fillrate (GTexels/s) | 4.6 | 0.65 | | Advanced Features | H.264 1080p Video Decode HW Accelerator | AFBC, ASTC, Adaptive Pixel-Gating, Transaction Elimination | | Development Support | Discontinued | Modern (OpenCL 2.0 support) |
This public link is valid for 7 days and shares a thread, including any personal information you added. This link or copies made by others cannot be deleted. If you share with third parties, their policies apply. Can’t copy the link right now. Try again later.
If you are purchasing a device in 2026, . It is outdated and cannot support modern software. The Mali-G31 MP2 provides a functional, efficient experience for streaming, light gaming, and standard daily tasks.
The Mali-G31 struggled. The G31 was a "cut-down" Bifrost architecture. Arm had stripped away some of the raw horsepower to fit it into the budget segment. In older OpenGL ES 2.0 games, the lack of raw fill-rate hurt him. He stuttered where the veteran soared. Mali-g31 Mp2 Vs Mali-450
Games like Angry Birds 2 , Subway Surfers , or Asphalt 8 (legacy version) run beautifully on the Mali-450. The high fillrate allows for smooth 60fps in 2D and simple 3D environments.
: Built on the , this GPU focuses on "performance density." It is roughly 20% smaller and 20% more energy-efficient than the
: Suitable for basic 1080p playback and 2D UI navigation, but may show stuttering in complex UIs. 3. Power Efficiency and Technology Node Mali-G31 MP2 Go to product viewer dialog for this item. | Specification | ARM Mali-450 MP4 | ARM
To visualize the differences, let's put the key specifications of the Mali-450 MP4 and the Mali-G31 MP2 next to each other.
This chip handles 4K user interfaces and complex UI skins with ease. It supports efficient scaling and user interface overlays, making the entire streaming experience feel fluid. 2. Gaming Performance
Disclaimer: This information is based on technology trends as of early 2026. Share public link If you share with third parties, their policies apply
This fundamental difference in design sets the stage for a clear performance gap. The new Bifrost architecture of the G31 is simply more efficient than the decade-old Utgard architecture of the Mali-450.
In smart TV boxes (where these GPUs are common), the G31 handles 4K user interfaces and video overlays much more smoothly. While the Mali-450 can play 4K video (if paired with a good VPU), its actual graphics performance often leads to laggy menus. www.arm.com Performance in Real-World Use
The most significant difference lies in the underlying architecture. The
When comparing the and the , the primary difference is the generational gap in technology . The Mali-G31 MP2
If you buy a device with a Mali-450 in 2025, you are buying an e-reader or a basic call phone.