Abu Dawood 4131 Fixed ((link)) ✦ Deluxe & Ultimate
According to the canonical compilation of Imam Abu Dawood, the narrative describes a gathering where Al-Miqdam openly questioned Mu'awiyah regarding specific practices forbidden by the Prophet Muhammad ﷺ. The Arabic Text
This remarkable narration combines multiple elements that make it invaluable for Islamic scholarship:
The central issue in this chain, and the reason some scholars considered the hadith problematic, is the narrator . Baqiyyah was a highly knowledgeable and respected hadith scholar from his era, known for his vast memory. However, he was also known to practice tadlis .
Interestingly, Muawiyah's reaction to the confrontation was not one of anger but of acknowledgment. He admitted, "I know that I cannot be saved from you, O Miqdam," and subsequently treated al-Miqdam with generosity, giving him more than his two companions received.
Islam calls us to humility in our appearance. Whether it is our clothes, our walk, or our speech, we must avoid anything that feeds arrogance. Let us check our intentions and keep our garments above our ankles. abu dawood 4131 fixed
A man from the Banu Asad tribe remarked: "He was a burning coal which Allah has extinguished."
Wearing or riding upon the skins of wild beasts (tigers, leopards, etc.). Critical Findings
This authentication places Hadith 4131 firmly within the category of (authentic) narrations. Shaykh al-Albani, one of the most prominent Hadith scholars of the 20th century, conducted a rigorous re-evaluation of all Hadiths in Sunan Abi Dawood. His verdict on this particular narration was clear and unambiguous: its chain of transmission is sahih (sound). This is what users mean when they refer to Abu Dawood 4131 as being "fixed"—the Hadith has been definitively authenticated by a major Hadith authority.
The final grading of the hadith is as follows: According to the canonical compilation of Imam Abu
Condemns the use of leopard/beast skins as clothing or saddles.
To express his grief and hold authority accountable, Al-Miqdam insisted on confronting Mu'awiyah regarding specific prohibitions established by the Prophet Muhammad (ﷺ). He asked Mu'awiyah to verify under oath whether the Prophet prohibited: (for men) Wearing silk (for men) Using or riding upon the skins of beasts of prey
and others traveled to the court of Muawiyah in Syria. Upon their arrival, Muawiyah broke the news that , the grandson of the Prophet, had passed away. The Reaction:
The man of Banu Asad said: "(He was) a live coal which Allah has extinguished." However, he was also known to practice tadlis
(weak) to protect the reputation of historical figures, the standard scholarly consensus in collections like the Amrayn Hadith Database confirms its reliable chain of narrators. Sunnah.com 3. Why This Matters Today
Khalid continued: Muawiyah then ordered to give him what he did not order to give to his two companions, and gave a stipend of two hundred (dirhams) to his son. Al-Miqdam then divided it among his companions. The man of Banu Asad did not give anything to anyone from the property he received. When Muawiyah was informed about it, he said: "Al-Miqdam is a generous man; he has an open hand (for generosity). The man of Banu Asad withholds his things in a good manner."
To understand why "fixing" or correcting this Hadith is necessary, one must first understand the text as it appeared in many older printed editions and translations.
, highlight this hadith as evidence of historical tensions or "ill-will" (
This hadith is often cited by scholars as an example of the Sahaba's courage in speaking truth to power and the importance of adhering to the Prophet's (ﷺ) commands regarding modesty and avoiding extravagance. Sunan Abi Dawud 4131 - Clothing (Kitab Al-Libas)
Al-Miqdam claimed to have seen these prohibited items in Mu'awiyah's house, prompting Mu'awiyah to admit he could not escape Al-Miqdam's blunt honesty. Key Themes and Context