: The controversy raised significant questions regarding the limits of artistic expression and the rights of children. Legal and ethical experts debated whether the work constituted a valid artistic document or a form of parental exploitation.
Growing was not a painting or a sculpture, but a film project capturing the physical development of his young daughters over several years. The Conception of "Growing" (1976–1981)
Compared to the Neo-Expressionists of the early 1980s, Growing is remarkably restrained. Where Schnabel used broken plates and aggressive scale, Rivers uses a modest, intimate format. Compared to the Pop Art he helped pioneer, Growing is deeply subjective. It lacks the cool irony of Andy Warhol’s Oxidation Paintings (also from the late 1970s), which used metallic paint and urine to simulate decay. Rivers’ decay is organic and sad, not mechanical and cynical. The painting is closer in spirit to the late works of Philip Guston, who also returned to a clumsy, cartoonish figuration in the 1970s to explore existential themes. Like Guston’s Painting, Smoking, Eating (1973), Rivers’ Growing finds profundity in the awkward, bodily act of living. growing 1981 larry rivers
This public link is valid for 7 days and shares a thread, including any personal information you added. This link or copies made by others cannot be deleted. If you share with third parties, their policies apply. Can’t copy the link right now. Try again later. N.Y.U. Doesn't Want Film of Larry Rivers's Naked Daughters
Conceived by the celebrated pioneer of Pop art as a documentary chronicling the physical development of his adolescent daughters, the 45-minute film has instead become a lightning rod for debates on child exploitation, artistic immunity, and familial trauma. Decades after its completion, the project continues to overshadow Rivers' artistic legacy. : The controversy raised significant questions regarding the
In the broader context of 1981, Rivers was experiencing a high degree of professional esteem. That same year, a major retrospective of his work traveled through European institutions, including the Kestner-Gesellschaft in Hanover and the Kunsthalle in Berlin. His other 1981 works, such as his cast paper relief Dutch Masters , continued his tradition of blending high art with consumer iconography—a stark contrast to the intensely private and controversial nature of the Growing project.
: Emma Rivers (later Emma Tamburlini) publicly condemned the work, describing the filming process as coercive and detailing the long-term psychological distress it caused. She sought the return and destruction of the footage to protect her privacy. The Ethical and Artistic Debate The Conception of "Growing" (1976–1981) Compared to the
For collectors and art historians tracking 20th-century American art, Larry Rivers' works from the early 1980s represent a fascinating investment vector. While his 1950s and 1960s Pop icons command the highest historical premium, his 1980s large-scale canvases offer incredible technical mastery and depth. Exhibition Context
The film remains one of the most controversial aspects of Rivers' legacy:
Information is available regarding Larry Rivers' broader impact on the Pop Art movement or his notable collaborations with members of the New York School of poets if that is of interest. The Crimes Against Thérèse Blanchard - Carolyn Gage