Moreover, some Grand Ayatollahs in Najaf issued informal statements (not fatwas) that Report 176 should be treated as a khabar wahid (single report) in rijal, not as foundational for biographical theory.
Trace how Report 176 was later utilized or summarized by subsequent scholars.
Before delving into Report 176, it is essential to clarify the nature of the source. Al-Kashi’s original work, Ma‘rifat al-Rijal , was lost for centuries. What survives is a recension (edited selection) by Shaykh al-Ta’ifah Muhammad ibn al-Hasan al-Tusi (d. 460 AH/1067 CE), who titled it Ikhtiyar Ma‘rifat al-Rijal . Ironically, we now call the entire work Rijal al-Kashi , attributing it to al-Kashi but acknowledging al-Tusi’s editorial hand.
Translation: "176 - Jibril ibn Ahmad and Abu Ishaq Hamdawayh and Ibrahim (sons of Nasir), they said: narrated to us Muhammad ibn Abd al-Hamid al-Attar al-Kufi, from Yunus ibn Ya'qub..." Rijal Al Kashi Report 176 -2021-
To determine how Report 176 influences modern Islamic jurisprudence, scholars subject the text to a rigorous three-step evaluation process:
What survives is an abridgement made by the influential scholar Shaykh Tusi (995–1067), who condensed the original work because he believed it contained many errors. Shaykh Tusi's abridgement is the version known today as Ikhtiyar ma'rifat al-rijal , or Rijal al-Kashi . This abridged version contains 1,115 hadiths and refers to 515 companions of the Shi'ite Imams, providing crucial information about their credibility and reliability as transmitters of religious knowledge.
The suffix "-2021-" in the keyword hints at a renewed academic or editorial interest in Rijal al-Kashshi . In 2021, several important publications and events regarding the text came into focus, marking a year of heightened scrutiny: Moreover, some Grand Ayatollahs in Najaf issued informal
Ultimately, Report 176 serves as an enduring case study of how minor textual entries in biographical dictionaries continue to shape macro-level understandings of Islamic history, politics, and law. Share public link
When analyzing a specific index like , researchers isolate three core components:
The most comprehensive 2021 analysis was titled: (Rijal al-Kashi Report 176 -2021- Research Paper No. 007, Islamic Seminary of Qom). Below are its major conclusions: Al-Kashi’s original work, Ma‘rifat al-Rijal , was lost
Before evaluating Report 176, it is necessary to understand the unique nature of the parent text. Unlike other biographical dictionaries that merely label a narrator as "trustworthy" ( thiqah ) or "weak" ( da'if ), Rijal al-Kashi provides raw historical context.
This comprehensive article explores the historical context of the report, the nature of its contents, its significance in Islamic historiography, and how it is analyzed in contemporary scholarship.
When Qays ibn Sa'd was commanded to step forward and pledge allegiance, he paused and looked toward Imam Husayn for instruction. At that moment, Imam Husayn deflected the gaze and directed him toward his older brother, stating:
"Rijal Al Kashi Report 176 -2021-" is more than just a bibliographic entry. It is a window into the living, breathing tradition of Shi'ite hadith authentication. The fact that a report written over a thousand years ago is still being debated in 2021 editions demonstrates the enduring relevance of classical texts. Each numbered report, including #176, offers a data point in the ongoing project of understanding the past to safeguard the authenticity of tradition in the present.
The debate surrounding Report 176 centers primarily on the reliability of its chain of transmission. In ʿIlm al-Rijal , a narrative's historical weight relies strictly on the character and accuracy of each transmitter. The Weakness of the Servant of Muhammad ibn Rashid